Faithful Celebrity
The Heresiarch expresses his disappointment with a speech by Richard Dawkins.
I'm sorry, folks, but Richard Dawkins increasingly resembles the later Frank Sinatra, free-wheeling it through the tunes that made him famous and cheered to the rafters because - wow, it's him, it's really him, IN THE FLESH. Or perhaps these events are more like pep rallies. The fact that we've heard it all before, more often in the same exact words, doesn't matter. In fact it's comforting, like a familiar liturgy. If we're being honest, he hasn't had an original thought in years.
The Heresiarch specialises in being provocative. But he points to a real danger in this biting piece. Becoming a celebrity- how does one avoid being like Dawkins, speaking to one's "groupies" for whom "even being in the same room as the great man is excitement in itself." And one fears, becoming enamoured of one's celebrity?
I spent a two day seminar with one of our UCA scholars this week. He was repeating himself, of course. How can you speak on a topic at which you have expertise, and not do this. But there was nothing of the Heresiarch's criticism which could be laid against him. Why? He was humble. He spoke to us and with us. He was not the expert presenting a lecture. He took people's questions seriously, even those which were "cringe worthy." He was a person among people, not an expert standing above us.
SharePrevious page: Is Facebook church?
Next page: A Veil of Silence over Murder
